-
Nurses’ Election Notice: Congratulations Dave! - 10 hours ago
-
Please Say Hello To The 11 New Members Of Local 2250! - 1 day ago
-
Point/Counterpoint: Should The Van Be Updated? - 1 day ago
-
Your Newsline: Money Matters, New Members, Paid Leave Law - 2 days ago
-
The Weekly Missouri Labor Report - May 5, 2025
-
Sunday Point/Counterpoint: Buying American - May 4, 2025
-
Say Hello to 51 new UAW Local 2250 members! - April 30, 2025
-
R4 Director Campbell and AD DeSpain Talk Tariffs, Politics, and More - April 30, 2025
-
Paid Leave: The Courts Stand With Voters, Will Republican Senators? - April 30, 2025
-
2025 Q1: Here’s What Profit Sharing Looks Like To Start The Year - April 29, 2025
Yes, Strikers Should Receive Unemployment Benefits
Turns out making strikers eligible for unemployment benefits is a good policy. The Economic Policy Institute has released Unemployment insurance for striking workers : a low cost policy that’s good for workers and state economies…
Summary: Lawmakers across the country are increasingly recognizing that making striking workers eligible for unemployment insurance (UI) is good for workers and good economics.Key findings
- Striking workers in most states are disqualified from receivingUI, which opens the door for employers to undermine union negotiations by engaging in bad faith tactics.
- Only two states —New Jersey and New York—currently extend UI to striking workers. Lawmakers in 13 additionalstates have previously introduced or are actively considering such policies.
- EPI estimates that the cost of extending employment insurance to strikers would represent between 0.04% to 0.96% of a given state’s total UI expenditures—an almost negligible share.
- These policies don’t only impact striking workers; they also help stabilize the economy by keeping dollars flowing to communities where a strike is taking place.
- While opponents have raised concerns that such policies will encourage more strikes, providing UI protections to striking workers may actuallylead to fewer strikes.