-
The Colorado/Canyon That Tracks Down a Taco! - December 17, 2024
-
Who, What, When, and Where of Layoff Information - December 15, 2024
-
Online Newsline #9: Holiday Party Is Today, UAW Members On Strike - December 15, 2024
-
Why You Should Wear A White Shirt on National White Shirt Day - December 12, 2024
-
You Voted In November, You Receive Better Vacation Benefits in 2029! - December 10, 2024
-
Online Newsline: Are You Eligible For The $500 Bonus? - December 10, 2024
-
St. Louis University Graduate Students Join UAW! - December 9, 2024
-
Please Help a Missouri UAW Member This Season! - December 6, 2024
-
So You Want To Be A Labor Leader? - December 5, 2024
-
What Is Social Security To You? - December 4, 2024
Employers Productivity Standards Are Not Real Science
Labor Notes addresses the problem of speed-up and job analysis in Employers Productivity Standards Are Not Real Science…
Frank and Lillian Gilbreth (of Cheaper by the Dozen fame) expanded on this by using frame-by-frame film study of workers performing tasks with a specially calibrated “microchronometer,” documenting worker micro-motions and the time they took.
More recently, with the tremendous growth in computing power and data collection, the ability to use technology to gather data about workers is ubiquitous, and bosses are eager to use these tools to maximize productivity and profits.
Today, most production targets heavily involve computers collecting data and computing efficiency metrics. Regardless of the specific details, all systems use the concept of “normal” time (the time needed for a normal worker performing at 100 percent pace), and then convert it to a “standard” time by adding time for personal needs, fatigue, and unavoidable delay (PFD).
This multiplier purports to account for the need to use the restroom, allow for the effect of physical, mental, and environmental fatigue, and reflect unexpected delays in the normal routine.
(royalty free image)