-
GMC Canyon: AT4, AT4X, and AT4X-AEV What Are The Differences? - 18 hours ago
-
Happy Martin Luther King Day! - January 19, 2025
-
The Weekly Missouri Labor Report: Your State, Your Job! - January 17, 2025
-
$25,000 Premiums for Health Care Insurance. You Don’t Have That Problem - January 16, 2025
-
Your UAW/GM National Agreement Is In Your Hand – Click Here! - January 16, 2025
-
Watch: Is Self-Checkout Saving You Money? Is It Costing Jobs? - January 15, 2025
-
News: Unemployment/SUB Status - January 13, 2025
-
Welcome Back! - January 13, 2025
-
Watch: Will You Ever Be Able To Retire? - January 12, 2025
-
IMPORTANT: Layoffs, Weather, and Workers Compensation - January 8, 2025
Employers Productivity Standards Are Not Real Science
Labor Notes addresses the problem of speed-up and job analysis in Employers Productivity Standards Are Not Real Science…
Frank and Lillian Gilbreth (of Cheaper by the Dozen fame) expanded on this by using frame-by-frame film study of workers performing tasks with a specially calibrated “microchronometer,” documenting worker micro-motions and the time they took.
More recently, with the tremendous growth in computing power and data collection, the ability to use technology to gather data about workers is ubiquitous, and bosses are eager to use these tools to maximize productivity and profits.
Today, most production targets heavily involve computers collecting data and computing efficiency metrics. Regardless of the specific details, all systems use the concept of “normal” time (the time needed for a normal worker performing at 100 percent pace), and then convert it to a “standard” time by adding time for personal needs, fatigue, and unavoidable delay (PFD).
This multiplier purports to account for the need to use the restroom, allow for the effect of physical, mental, and environmental fatigue, and reflect unexpected delays in the normal routine.
(royalty free image)