-
You Can Help a Kid This Holiday Season! - 11 hours ago
-
November Union Meeting! - 1 day ago
-
Video: Why American Cars Are So EXPENSIVE… - 1 day ago
-
SAP Phase 2 Is Here! - November 13, 2024
-
Tax Cuts For The Rich Create Debt, Division, and Despair - November 9, 2024
-
Pro-Worker Referendum For Minimum Wage and Paid Leave Were Winners This Election - November 8, 2024
-
New Retiree Recognition Dinner next Tuesday November 12, 2024! - November 7, 2024
-
Sunday Guest Opinion: We Must Limit The Power of Corporations - November 3, 2024
-
Cookies With Santa! - October 31, 2024
-
Adopt-a-Child Bake Sale - October 31, 2024
Employers Productivity Standards Are Not Real Science
Labor Notes addresses the problem of speed-up and job analysis in Employers Productivity Standards Are Not Real Science…
Frank and Lillian Gilbreth (of Cheaper by the Dozen fame) expanded on this by using frame-by-frame film study of workers performing tasks with a specially calibrated “microchronometer,” documenting worker micro-motions and the time they took.
More recently, with the tremendous growth in computing power and data collection, the ability to use technology to gather data about workers is ubiquitous, and bosses are eager to use these tools to maximize productivity and profits.
Today, most production targets heavily involve computers collecting data and computing efficiency metrics. Regardless of the specific details, all systems use the concept of “normal” time (the time needed for a normal worker performing at 100 percent pace), and then convert it to a “standard” time by adding time for personal needs, fatigue, and unavoidable delay (PFD).
This multiplier purports to account for the need to use the restroom, allow for the effect of physical, mental, and environmental fatigue, and reflect unexpected delays in the normal routine.
(royalty free image)