-
The National Labor Relations Board Can Function Again! - 1 day ago
-
Welcome: 64 New Members of UAW Local 2250 - March 7, 2025
-
Silent Auction: Stop By And Put a Bid In! - March 6, 2025
-
Don’t Let Missouri Legislators Cut Your Unemployment - March 6, 2025
-
Newsline: New Members, Easter, and Union Made Vehicles! - March 4, 2025
-
You Can Carry Your National Agreement 24/7/365 - March 4, 2025
-
271,500 Workers Went On Strike Last Year! - March 4, 2025
-
Missouri Legislature Trying To Cut Unemployment to 8 weeks! - March 2, 2025
-
Weekly Labor Report: Mo Could Make Wentzville Child Care a Reality! - March 1, 2025
-
Memorial Day Coming Up: How About A Great Shirt To Honor Heroes? - March 1, 2025
Yes, Strikers Should Receive Unemployment Benefits
Turns out making strikers eligible for unemployment benefits is a good policy. The Economic Policy Institute has released Unemployment insurance for striking workers : a low cost policy that’s good for workers and state economies…
Summary: Lawmakers across the country are increasingly recognizing that making striking workers eligible for unemployment insurance (UI) is good for workers and good economics.Key findings
- Striking workers in most states are disqualified from receivingUI, which opens the door for employers to undermine union negotiations by engaging in bad faith tactics.
- Only two states —New Jersey and New York—currently extend UI to striking workers. Lawmakers in 13 additionalstates have previously introduced or are actively considering such policies.
- EPI estimates that the cost of extending employment insurance to strikers would represent between 0.04% to 0.96% of a given state’s total UI expenditures—an almost negligible share.
- These policies don’t only impact striking workers; they also help stabilize the economy by keeping dollars flowing to communities where a strike is taking place.
- While opponents have raised concerns that such policies will encourage more strikes, providing UI protections to striking workers may actuallylead to fewer strikes.