Share

Yes, Strikers Should Receive Unemployment Benefits

Turns out making strikers eligible for unemployment benefits is a good policy.  The Economic Policy Institute has released Unemployment insurance for striking workers : a low cost policy that’s good for workers and state economies

Summary: Lawmakers across the country are increasingly recognizing that making striking workers eligible for unemployment insurance (UI) is good for workers and good economics.

Key findings

  • Striking workers in most states are disqualified from receivingUI, which opens the door for employers to undermine union negotiations by engaging in bad faith tactics. 
  • Only two states —New Jersey and New York—currently extend UI to striking workers. Lawmakers in 13 additionalstates have previously introduced or are actively considering such policies.
  • EPI estimates that the cost of extending employment insurance to strikers would represent between 0.04% to 0.96% of a given state’s total UI expenditures—an almost negligible share.
  • These policies don’t only impact striking workers; they also help stabilize the economy by keeping dollars flowing to communities where a strike is taking place.
  • While opponents have raised concerns that such policies will encourage more strikesproviding UI protections to striking workers may actuallylead to fewer strikes.